Local-first coding agents

Agentic Software Development: A Practical Workflow for Developers

Build an agentic software-development workflow around investigation, planning, bounded execution, review, and validation instead of one giant prompt.

agentic software developmentagentic coding workflowAI software development workflowcoding agent workflow

Treat the agent as part of the development loop

Agentic software development is not handing a vague feature request to a model and hoping for a finished product. It is a workflow where an agent can inspect evidence, propose a plan, use bounded tools, and produce a change that a developer can review and validate.

This mirrors good engineering practice. The agent accelerates investigation and execution, while the developer retains responsibility for scope, trade-offs, and acceptance criteria.

Use a five-step loop

A repeatable loop prevents both the developer and the agent from jumping to edits before the problem is understood.

  • Inspect: gather the error, affected files, and current Git state.
  • Plan: state the intended change and validation before writing.
  • Execute: use only the tools and permissions the task needs.
  • Review: inspect the diff, tool activity, and unexpected changes.
  • Verify: run tests, checks, or a concrete manual validation.

Make the handoff explicit

A good agent response identifies what changed, what it verified, and what remains uncertain. That makes it useful during a pull-request review or a later debugging session, not just at the moment a patch appears.

Truss supports this loop with Chat for questions, Plan for read-only investigation, Agent for permitted execution, durable workspace state, and Git-aware views for review.

Next steps

Put it to work in your own workspace.

Pick the surface that fits your day, then connect a model you control.

FAQ

Questions developers ask before switching.

What is agentic software development?

It is a development approach where agents participate in a structured engineering loop, using context and tools under human-defined boundaries rather than acting as a one-shot code generator.

Does agentic development replace code review?

No. It can improve preparation and execution, but diffs, tests, and human acceptance remain essential.